The 4-Minute Friendship

Every morning at 8:02am, I board the same train from my local station to Central—a precise four-minute journey. As a scientist, I’ve optimized everything: the same door, the fastest exit route. And there’s this guy who’s clearly done the same thing. We’ve noticed each other, exchanged those half-smiles that acknowledge shared efficiency, but nothing more.

I want to say hello.

It sounds ridiculous, I know. This is the Netherlands, where strangers don’t talk to strangers. People are wonderfully warm once you know them, but there’s no culture of superficial pleasantries. Maybe I’m just missing those easy “hellos” from my San Diego days. Or maybe I’m drawn to the story potential—imagine that: a four-minute friendship.

But what I really want is something that’s just mine. I’ve imagined us getting to know each other in those four minutes—sharing that time because that’s all we’ll have, and that’s something I won’t have to share with anyone else. A connection that exists purely in its own space, untouched by the complexity of the rest of my life.

But mostly, it reminds me of Mumbai.

The Magic I Remember

From age sixteen, trains were my lifeline in Mumbai. Yes, the crowds and chaos are real, but something beautiful lived within that chaos: friendships, community, the way people held onto each other and never let go.

In 11th grade, I took the 6:13 ladies’ special—an hour-long journey across the city. What I discovered was a traveling sisterhood. Women who’d taken this train for years had formed deep friendships during that daily hour. They’d sing songs, prep vegetables for dinner, create a mobile party before heading home to demanding families and post work stress.

When life got hard, they were there for each other—planning meals, careers, futures. They were the 6:13 ladies’ special friends, forever. These women weren’t invisible. They claimed that space, made it theirs, created community right there in public.

My dad traveled the same train route for decades and built friendships the same way. It struck me that despite appearing introverted, he probably had meaningful connections we never knew about. These relationships with strangers fascinated me because nobody chose them initially. You had nothing in common but a train ride, yet somehow you became close. Like children making friends—no questions about background, destination, religion, or skin color.

Once, traveling from home in Mumbai to my hostel in Navi Mumbai, I had to sprint for a connecting train at Bandra station. Another woman was running too. In true Bollywood fashion, we both made it onto the moving train, probably helping each other up. We spent the next hour talking like best friends. She was picking up her wedding dress—a rare trip for her. I was making one of my last journeys before moving to the US. We had nothing in common except that moment.

As I got off, the train started moving. My awkward self hadn’t even thought to ask for her number—what was the point? But she came to the door and asked if I was on Facebook. We connected, discovered a mutual friend, and still keep in touch years later. We both remember that conversation fondly. That connection exists as its own perfect thing, separate from everything else in both our lives.

The Barriers We Build

When I moved to the Netherlands, I was excited to resume these train adventures. Two years later, I’ve realized it’s not happening here—not because Dutch people are cold, but because we’ve all created barriers.

Everyone has headphones on, staring at screens or reading books. I’m guilty of it too. I’m always listening to music, reading, or sleeping. I understand why—like me, everyone is probably trying to use this time to decompress. We’re not looking to make meaningful friendships at all.

We read constantly about the loneliness epidemic, about how hard it is to find partners, how people are becoming more antisocial. Yet we simultaneously create the very barriers that prevent the connections we crave. Our coping mechanisms—music, books, screens to decompress—eliminate the spaces where random connections could happen.

I am socially awkward—I do better in writing than speaking. My younger self was different. She was unaware of her awkwardness, her undiagnosed ADHD symptoms making her bounce around like a headless chicken with unconscious courage. Age, experience, and living across different continents have made me more mature, but somehow my spontaneity got lost in the process. I miss that fearless version of myself, even as I appreciate who I’ve become.

There’s something else I’ve noticed: as I approach my late thirties, I see how I’m becoming less visible in public spaces—not to my family or friends, but to strangers on trains. Being completely overlooked is heartbreaking. I want to feel relevant, like I still matter in shared spaces.

Why Four Minutes Matters

So maybe saying hello to this train guy isn’t just about connection. Maybe it’s about asserting that I still exist in public spaces, that middle-aged women can still make the first move, can still be interesting to strangers.

Maybe it’s about reclaiming a small piece of spontaneous humanity that I’ve watched slip away—both from myself and from the world around us.

The 6:13 ladies’ special taught me that some connections don’t need to go anywhere to be meaningful. They don’t need to be productive or develop into something useful. They can exist entirely for themselves, in a contained space and time.

I want to say hello to my four-minute friend. Worst case scenario: I’ll have to take the slightly unoptimized back door forever.

But maybe some connections are worth the risk of awkwardness. Maybe in our rush toward efficiency and digital connection, we’ve forgotten that visibility—being seen, being relevant—sometimes starts with something as simple as saying hello.

Next time the train comes, I think I will say hey!

When Letters Stopped Coming

It’s strange how childhood friendships can live in our imagination long after they’re gone. The connections we form as children—innocent, uncomplicated, and pure—often become the measuring sticks for relationships throughout our lives. Sometimes, these connections get severed not by choice but by circumstance, leaving us with questions that linger for years. This is the story of one such friendship that shaped my understanding of connection, loss, and the arbitrary nature of borders.

When I was in Kindergarten in Mumbai, I had a very close friend named Sam. We were as close as 4-year-olds could be. One day, my mom took me to Sam’s home for evening tea. Back in the 90s, I don’t think traveling to someone’s house for a play date was common. We had friends at school, friends in our apartment complex, friends at drawing classes, and so on. No one ever went for specific playdates. I didn’t think it was weird—I was just 4.

Then my mom told me that Sam was moving from Bombay to Jammu and Kashmir. She showed me Jammu and Kashmir in a giant atlas we had at home, and it looked impossibly far away. Mom suggested we exchange letters and got their new address. I knew my ABCs but had never thought about writing actual letters. For the first few attempts, my mom wrote postcards on my behalf, and then I started writing them myself when I was a bit older.

Sam and I wrote back and forth for a few years. We wished each other happy birthday, sent greeting cards—nothing fancy. We were 1st graders, so we didn’t have much to talk about. I always took pride in having an “online” friend even before pen pals became popular.

I knew Sam’s birthday was in the same month as mine (which I thought made us especially cool friends), and I had memorized her “address”: Sam c/o P.H. something-something, Army Colony, Jammu Tawi something-something. Initially, my mom properly addressed my letters, but once I learned to do it myself, she probably didn’t proofread them. In my 2nd or 3rd-grade mind, I was mailing to her correctly, but the post office workers likely thought it was addressed to Santa Claus, and Sam probably stopped receiving my letters. Eventually, I thought Sam had stopped writing to me. We also moved to a new house during those years, and I never gave Sam my new address. Sadly, we lost touch.

I always considered her my “first” friend and often thought of her, told my current friends about her, and secretly wished her happy birthday for years.

In the summer of 1999, there was a war between India and Pakistan. Social media back then was just the news my family watched. I didn’t really understand much, and asking “grown-up” questions wasn’t encouraged. From what I recall, this war was fought in Jammu and Kashmir over the Kargil region that Pakistan attempted to claim. As a child, I understood that the war was happening in Jammu and Kashmir and many people were dying at the border.

Since then, Jammu and Kashmir became this mysterious, “unsafe” place in my mind. Even though India won the war, the fear never left my thoughts. Jammu and Kashmir transformed into this imaginary place where only soldiers went—and died. I somehow started believing that’s what happened to Sam and her family. That she had died, and that’s why she stopped writing back. I completely made up this story and truly believed it for a while. My friend was a martyr who died in a war. In my defense, she did live in “Army Colony,” which in my child’s logic meant army people, which meant dead soldiers in Jammu.

Once I was older, I doubted this story but had no way to verify it. By then, I no longer had her complete address, and the gaps in my memory remained unfilled.

This experience profoundly shaped me in ways I didn’t fully understand until much later. The belief that Sam might have died in a conflict made me develop a deep aversion to fights—big or small. I began to see all conflicts as unnecessary escalations that could lead to irreversible loss. Death is a one-way street, and the thought that I might never see someone again because of senseless fighting haunted me. Why end any relationship on an angry note when tomorrow isn’t guaranteed? This mindset has stayed with me; I still actively try to avoid unnecessary escalation in disagreements, always aware of how permanent separation can be.

It wasn’t until 2011, when I grew bored of talking to my existing friends on Facebook, that I randomly thought of her again. I decided to look her up. Her name was unique, so the search results weren’t too extensive. One profile had a very similar birthdate—June 17th instead of June 18th—but maybe I had remembered it wrong. Worth a try. I sent her a message with a brief introduction and apologized if she wasn’t the person I was looking for.

She responded within hours and recognized me, my mom, and even remembered the bag my mom had gifted her before she moved. I was thrilled, and so was she. To my surprise, she had moved back to Mumbai long ago and attended college very close to mine. We arranged to meet at a café, each bringing another friend along because, honestly, it felt strange.

Our reunion was pleasant, but not the movie-ending moment one might expect. She was very different from me, and I found myself connecting more with her friend than with Sam herself. It dawned on me that had we known each other all along, perhaps we could have remained close friends—but our lives and experiences had diverged too much. We had a wonderful evening together, shared memories, and happily went our separate ways, both with a sense of closure. Though we aren’t particularly close anymore and have little in common now, I’m grateful to know she’s alive and well. I’m relieved she isn’t dead.

The reality was much more ordinary than the dramatic story I had constructed in my mind. Our lives now remain quite different—and that’s perfectly fine. It was real, not a fairy tale, and there’s something beautiful about that authenticity.

With recent tensions between India and Pakistan, I worry about how Jammu and Kashmir will once again become this mysterious place where only soldiers go to die—heaven on earth that you only experience if you’re prepared to sacrifice yourself. I know it’s easier now to check on loved ones, but the fear of losing someone or a long-lost friend still haunts me.

Are we still so divided even after all these years of independence? I know I’m not qualified to comment on the political situation (I barely passed history in school), but it’s heartbreaking to live in a world where human life seems so dispensable. How are we letting the enemies who separated us win, even after they’re long gone? I’m not suggesting India and Pakistan should reunite, but couldn’t we find a way to share that beautiful part of the world? How can we raise our children in a world where it’s somehow acceptable to lose—or even just fear losing—a friend to senseless conflict?

Perhaps my personal journey with Sam mirrors something larger about our world. Just as I fabricated a tragic ending to our friendship in the absence of communication, nations too can build narratives about each other when genuine connection is lost. And just as reconnecting with Sam revealed a more ordinary but authentic reality than my dramatic imagination had conjured, maybe real dialogue could replace the stories we tell ourselves about those across borders.

This experience has taught me something profound about the nature of relationships and memory. I realize now that I had romanticized my long-lost connection with Sam, building it into something larger than life in my absence of information. Perhaps it’s okay to accept that we are different people than who we were five years ago—let alone twenty. Old friendships don’t need to maintain the same closeness to retain their value. I’ve learned to cherish what I have right now and think of old memories fondly without expecting those friendships to remain frozen in time.

Sometimes, the greatest gift of reconnecting with someone from your past isn’t rekindling what once was, but gaining the perspective to appreciate what is—and the clarity to let go of what isn’t meant to be. Maybe that’s a lesson worth remembering, both for personal relationships and for the artificial divisions we create between people.